|
Sep 22 |
John Piper is Still a Racist
For the two of you who don't know who John Piper is, allow me to introduce him. John Piper is first and foremost a Calvinist. That is his primary identity. After that he's a white, male, evangelical, US American, Christian—in that order. He's written a ton of books, some of which are best sellers. And he pastors a Baptist mega-church in Minneapolis, MN. But he's best known for hunting down "heretics" like Greg Boyd and N. T. Wright and setting them straight in his books. You know, the way the Calvinist Bible prescribes.
Piper is a highly influential figure. Millions of Christians in the US look to his leadership and believe his interpretations of natural disasters. If he says that a tornado knocking over a steeple is an sign that God is angry about homosexuality, millions of US American Christians take that straight to the bank. He leads large international organizations like the Gospel Coalition (I refuse to link), which show us just how wrong we've been on what the Gospel is. Didn't you know Calvinism is the Gospel? Now you know. Piper on RaceRecently, John Piper has decided he need a new boogieman. In his estimation, he's already defeated Open theism, he's defeated N. T. Wright, and he's defeated Arminianism. What's next for old Pipe dogg you ask? Racial diversity. Apparently the last enemy to the Gospel which must be destroyed by Piper's heresy-seeking Calvinist missiles is the desire to see more than just white people in your church. This, Piper contends, seeks to destroy the church. So, of course, the only right thing to do is write a book about it. (That's what Jesus would do, right?) But before you mistakenly think these are rantings of a senile, racist old man, Piper wants to assure us all that he's no longer a racist. Sure, he used to be a racist. (Weren't we all?) But since those days, he's moved into the inner-city and adopted a black child. Racist people don't do those things, right?! Now, he doesn't want you to think he's one of those types of pastors. You know, the type that move into the city so that they can get to know their neighbors. Please do not mistake him for the kind of pastor who lives close to his church so that the church will reflect the community in which it is found. No, he puts our minds at ease by assuring us God has called him to more important things like traveling and writing books. He makes sure we know his church is not racially diverse. Thank God!!
Ultimately, what Piper wants to convey to his readers is this: You have to make a decision. Which are you going to choose:
or
Certainly you are no fool. You would never throw Jesus under the bus for racial diversity. In fact, you wouldn't even sit next to Jesus on the bus—he is a Jew after all. No, you're not going to fall into the trap Piper warns us about. You won't love your neighbor who is of a different race than you, or worship with her. Because that would require you to sacrifice the Gospel. [scratches head] …or does it? The Bible on RaceJohn Piper loves Paul. If John Piper were a homosexual person, and Paul were still alive, he would ask Paul out on a date (even though he's already married). That's how much he loves Paul. It's really a bad bromance! So what does Paul think about race?? Let's ask him!
Hmmmm So Paul says both Gentiles (all non-Hebrew peoples) and Jews were reconciled by the atonement of Jesus. Paul says that the dividing barrier between the these two racial groups has been destroyed by Christ's work on the cross. Paul says that they have become one body reconciled to God, at peace with God and one another. And Paul says that God is joining them together so they can be built up into the spiritual dwelling of God. Ya, Piper is right. Racial diversity has nothing to do with the Gospel. In fact, we know heaven won't be racially diverse! So why would the church reflect that diversity now?
|
|
| Tags: | ||
| Links:
|
||






No ad hominem
Hi Dan,
While I'm thankful for the comment, and very happy that you hate Calvinism, I'm afraid you are mistaken that I have perpetrated an ad hominem attack on poor Mr. Piper.
See, there is a difference between a pointed, saracstic, critique and ad hominem. Just because you were made uncomfortable by my rhetoric doesn't make it ad hominem. Here's the difference. I haven't accused this author of having immoral character. You may object saying "but, but, but.... you said he was racist." And you'd be correct that I do claim Piper is still racist (despite his claims to be freed from such bondage), but you'd be incorrect that this is an accusation against his character.
Here's is the part that many, if not most, white people (particularly males) don't get. Racism isn't the same as racial prejudice. Racial prejudice is just that: prejudice. Racism is specifically the use of power to oppress a people group.
I have no idea if Piper is racially prejudice; I can't see into his heart to judge his motives. But what I can observe from his CT excerpt from Bloodlines is that he continues to use his power (his influence as a Christian leader) to perpetuate theories of racial reconcilation that are oppressive to minorites. Therefore, Piper continues to be racist.
I recognize that white people (particularly white males) hate being called racist, and often take great offense, even defending themselves with absurd statements about the ethnicity of their adopted children or their "close" friends. But this offense is unproductive unless it causes white people to reflect upon their employment of power in the service of protecting their privildge in society. Piper remains unreflective at this point.
Thanks again for the comment. You've inspired me to write more on the racism of US evangelical leaders like Piper!
I don't know about this.
Obviously you don't like Calvinism, and that's fine. It's the ad hominem attack on John Piper that gets me upset with this article. I guess Rev. Piper is asking for this type of criticism, given his brutal honesty and self-imposed vulnerability. The attack still isn't right. If you have a PERSONAL reason against Rev. Piper, such as he has personally wronged you (and I'm not talking about getting bent out of shape from reading "Desiring God") then lay all your cards on the table or, even better, learn to forgive. Otherwise, quit the crap!
Post new comment